Another stoopid Saw movie????
I am not surprised if the latest installment of the Saw released in the US recently will reach our shores soon. Although i havent seen the movie nor have any inclination on 'visually degrading' myself to the bloody gorefest, I am concerned about the level of violence in movies today. Critics and fans may say.....C'mon, it's just a movie. However sometimes we can't unsee what we have seen on movies. If the movie does make it into our theatres, I hope our censors have a happy time snipping away large chunks of the violent scenes. The first Saw was interesting, albeit gory, it has a plot and storyline. After watching the first one out of curiosity, I promised myself i will never see another movie of this nature again.
What does graphic violence do to audiences?
Producers use graphic violence in films, with the intention to produce an adrenaline rush in the audience. Films of this nature not only desensitizes the viewer to the victim's pain and but also to the debasement of the perpetrator. In many instances, these films glorify violence and the persons who commit it. How has entertainment come to this level when people can enjoy watching others suffer in the most excruciating manner?
Violence in movies might make some kids aggressive. Surprisingly in the first Saw movie, I noticed there are kids in the midst of the audience.
Pain and suffering and death are parts of life. Certain movies which portray these elements are trying to deliver these messages to the audience. The terror in Saving Private Ryan obviously advances the message of the film, and so do other classic tasteful war epics like "Bridge over River Kwai." These films depict real events and human suffering to educate people on the harsh realities of wars and may it never be repeated.
May the “Saw” mini-franchise, dulled into a bloody gore-fest bore after only three installments, rest in peace.
'Anti-tasteless horror movie' critic. Free our brains from these kind of movies. People who watch it are degrading themselves.
ZT.